-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Brian Paul wrote:
> Dave Airlie wrote:
>>> I'm looking at making the 7.5 release on Friday.  The main objective of 
>>> this development release will be an initial milestone / roll-out of the 
>>> Gallium bits.  Then, I'd like to quickly create the Mesa 7.6 branch for 
>>> stabilization.  git/master will then again be open to any/all development.
>>>
>>> If this is too soon for anyone, let me know so we can work something out.
>>>
>>> I also think a 7.4.1 release will happen soon.  7.4 had a bit of a 
>>> regression in the glTexParameter() code which Roland found/fixed.  Plus 
>>> there's some other useful bug fixes on the 7.4 branch.
>> I'd really like to merge the radeon-rewrite branch sooner rather than 
>> later,
>>
>> however I still think DRI2 needs some more work and I'd hate to have us 
>> release something where the interfaces haven't settled, I'd at least like
>> to see front buffer rendering working so we run test suites on it.
> 
> I guess another option is to create a 7.6/stable branch on Friday, but not 
> make the 7.5 release for a little bit.  That would give us a stable branch 
> for our work while leaving master as-is.  There's no rule that 7.5 must be 
> released before we start 7.6/stable.

This is something that I've been wanting to discuss for some time.  I
think we should slightly adjust our release process.  My suggestion is:

 * Decide on a cut-off date for new features in master.
 * At that cut-off date, make a branch for the next 7.n release.
 * Allow bug fixes, testing, etc. on that branch for some period.
 * Make the 7.n release.
 * Continue making bug fixes and, perhaps, low-impact new device support
to that branch for the next 7.n.m release.

This basically means that we'd do Mesa 7.5 really soon, and follow that
with Mesa 7.5.1 in a few weeks.  Mesa 7.5.1 is, basically, what Mesa 7.6
would have been.

I believe that we should establish at least a loose policy of which 7.n
branches we intend to maintain.

Opinions?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkneNbMACgkQX1gOwKyEAw+bOwCfbrXvWkm9d25Xf7u4KvIGyTK1
ppwAnjkJsVFn/D927YEOpLoNMkewJ0TJ
=pHER
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
_______________________________________________
Mesa3d-dev mailing list
Mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev

Reply via email to