-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

tom fogal wrote:
> Is there any reason TLS for glX is disabled by default?  Most systems
> support TLS these days, do they not?  Further, I'm not sure if this is
> shared but my opinion is that the default configurations should cater
> to the common case.

I vaguely recall there being some interaction with the X server.  If
Mesa is built for TLS, then the X server must also be built for TLS.  If
a non-TLS X server loads a TLS Mesa driver, it will fail with unresolved
symbols.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkr2EOgACgkQX1gOwKyEAw8KrQCdFYN15ZgyHHYJZV/sbX3+2Qv8
hmMAoJQp4FtqMNqm0nHIX5Dl4ba07zzA
=yHxS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Mesa3d-dev mailing list
Mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev

Reply via email to