> On 2012-03-20 22:10:29, Vinod Kone wrote:
> > src/launcher/executor.cpp, line 66
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/4408/diff/1/?file=93750#file93750line66>
> >
> >     redundant due to the CHECK above

Fixed now in https://reviews.apache.org/r/4420.


> On 2012-03-20 22:10:29, Vinod Kone wrote:
> > src/slave/reaper.cpp, line 62
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/4408/diff/1/?file=93753#file93753line62>
> >
> >     why do you need this?

You could imagine a user attaching to a running executor to debug. This stops 
the process, but it might be resumed. We don't want to treat the stop as an 
exited/terminated executor.


- Benjamin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/4408/#review6106
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 2012-03-20 00:55:15, Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/4408/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2012-03-20 00:55:15)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, John Sirois and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Made sure the slave sends status updates for tasks launched via a CommandInfo 
> and updated Task to make 'executor_id' optional for the cases when a task was 
> launched with a CommandInfo (w/ corresponding changes in the master and 
> slave)."[commandinfo_exit 4858fe1] Made sure the slave sends status updates 
> for tasks launched via a CommandInfo and updated Task to make 'executor_id' 
> optional for the cases when a task was launched with a CommandInfo (w/ 
> corresponding changes in the master and slave).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/common/try.hpp ed5611b 
>   src/launcher/executor.cpp aac1053 
>   src/master/master.cpp 0222bb2 
>   src/messages/messages.proto 11a2c41 
>   src/slave/reaper.cpp 93e47e7 
>   src/slave/slave.hpp de304cb 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp ddd1874 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/4408/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin
> 
>

Reply via email to