> On 2012-04-24 19:27:14, John Sirois wrote:
> > src/zookeeper/group.hpp, line 61
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/4844/diff/2/?file=104001#file104001line61>
> >
> >     I'm not finding a way to read this sanely:
> >     ~'returns true if cancelled.../ <-> membership.watch()
> >     
> >     IIUC all of these are more clear names:
> >     cancelled()
> >     withdrawn()
> >     discarded()
> >     abandoned()
> >     
> >     Each says to me the membership was chosen to be withdrawn by the user 
> > (vs via session expiry).
> >     
> >

Done.


> On 2012-04-24 19:27:14, John Sirois wrote:
> > src/zookeeper/group.hpp, line 102
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/4844/diff/2/?file=104001#file104001line102>
> >
> >     s/dat/data/

Done.


- Benjamin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/4844/#review7182
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 2012-04-23 18:49:26, Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/4844/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2012-04-23 18:49:26)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, John Sirois and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> (1) Renamed Group::info to Group::data (and associated changes).
> (2) Added Group::Membership::watch to explicitly watch for a single 
> membership's cancellation (and associated GroupProcess changes).
> (3) Fixed a but in GroupProcess::update that was deleting a Watch object when 
> also re-enqueueing it.
> (4) Updated the GroupProcess destructor to fail all outstanding futures 
> associated with the Group.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/log/network.hpp 0f7fefd 
>   src/tests/zookeeper_tests.cpp a852103 
>   src/zookeeper/group.hpp 695a8ab 
>   src/zookeeper/group.cpp c9122f6 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/4844/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin
> 
>

Reply via email to