Re: Review Request: Updated a fault-tolerant test to deal with updates in libprocess. This included changing some constant names to be more descriptive and updating the WAIT_UNTIL abstraction to be more general and work with arbitrary expressions.

[Vinod Kone]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5264/#review8215
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!



src/tests/fault_tolerance_tests.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/5264/#comment17763>

    cool!



src/tests/utils.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/5264/#comment17764>

    can be 'e' be coerced into output here?


- Vinod


On 2012-05-30 00:16:56, Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/5264/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2012-05-30 00:16:56)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, John Sirois and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/constants.hpp c3b0b25 
>   src/master/master.cpp 89cdaf6 
>   src/tests/fault_tolerance_tests.cpp b2529ca 
>   src/tests/utils.hpp e81ec82 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5264/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin
> 
>