Re: Review Request: Updated a fault-tolerant test to deal with updates in libprocess. This included changing some constant names to be more descriptive and updating the WAIT_UNTIL abstraction to be more general and work with arbitrary expressions.

[Benjamin Hindman]

> On May 30, 2012, 4:42 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > src/tests/utils.hpp, line 299
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/5264/diff/1/?file=110547#file110547line299>
> >
> >     can be 'e' be coerced into output here?

Totally awesome idea, done.


- Benjamin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5264/#review8215
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 30, 2012, 12:16 a.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/5264/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 30, 2012, 12:16 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, John Sirois and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/constants.hpp c3b0b25 
>   src/master/master.cpp 89cdaf6 
>   src/tests/fault_tolerance_tests.cpp b2529ca 
>   src/tests/utils.hpp e81ec82 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5264/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Hindman
> 
>