-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5870/#review10371
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/master/simple_allocator_process.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/5870/#comment22052>

    Please add a comment describing what this struct is and how it gets used 
below.



src/master/simple_allocator_process.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/5870/#comment22051>

    s/SlaveDedication/Dedication/



src/master/simple_allocator_process.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/5870/#comment22047>

    Comment this guy.



src/master/simple_allocator_process.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/5870/#comment22049>

    s/slaveDedications/dedications/



src/master/simple_allocator_process.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/5870/#comment22045>

    const&



src/slave/flags.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/5870/#comment22048>

    Let's make these their own flags.


- Benjamin Hindman


On Aug. 8, 2012, 10:19 p.m., Thomas Marshall wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/5870/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 8, 2012, 10:19 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Simple implementation of a static allocator.
> 
> This patch depends on 2 other pending code review:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/5599/
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/5913/
> 
> 
> This addresses bug MESOS-230.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-230
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/simple_allocator_process.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/slave/flags.hpp 0c7917f 
>   src/tests/allocator_tests.cpp b3db13d 
>   src/tests/utils.hpp a768360 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5870/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check on Lion
> new test in allocator_process_tests.cpp
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Thomas Marshall
> 
>

Reply via email to