----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6643/#review10374 -----------------------------------------------------------
src/tests/log_tests.cpp <https://reviews.apache.org/r/6643/#comment22072> Just curious, is it possible to use Clock::advance() or something like that to make the test more robust? (instead of relying on absolute timeout which depends on how fast your machine is). - Jie Yu On Aug. 15, 2012, 7:26 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/6643/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Aug. 15, 2012, 7:26 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Jie Yu. > > > Description > ------- > > I get some flakiness on my local machine, so bumping up the timeouts. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/tests/log_tests.cpp 9397da4 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6643/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > Ben Mahler > >
