----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6837/#review10958 -----------------------------------------------------------
src/tests/stout_tests.cpp <https://reviews.apache.org/r/6837/#comment23528> it's definitely not more readable, but it makes it obvious that the constructors take doubles which do we prefer? I like the look of the non-decimal numbers, but I wouldn't want to have any code passing int literals for doubles - Ben Mahler On Aug. 29, 2012, 7:18 p.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/6837/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Aug. 29, 2012, 7:18 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, John Sirois and Vinod Kone. > > > Description > ------- > > See summary. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/tests/stout_tests.cpp 91bcc13 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6837/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > Benjamin Hindman > >
