-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8570/#review16624
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/slave/reaper.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/8570/#comment35288>

    You're passing -1 to the listeners here! Can you propagate an error instead 
when the call fails?
    
    Right now you log the warning, but then notify anyway. This should either 
not notify them, or notify them of the error, I lack the context to know which 
is more appropriate atm.



src/tests/process_spawn.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/8570/#comment35290>

    This file is outside our coding conventions, can you add a TODO to clean it 
up?



third_party/libprocess/include/stout/proc.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/8570/#comment35289>

    What else do you see going in here?
    
    I'd imagine linux/proc.hpp moving to stout, at which point do you expect to 
consolidate the two? If not, then we may want to move this function into os.hpp.


- Ben Mahler


On Feb. 14, 2013, 3:30 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/8570/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 14, 2013, 3:30 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Needed this to properly monitor the exit status of re-connected executors, as 
> they will be parented by INIT. 
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/Makefile.am c94736df660a25b58dc47c07d9c56c3c26152a66 
>   src/linux/proc.hpp e0825a4a9f9e2763e0c25d7319f220bfe7c7c29c 
>   src/linux/proc.cpp 8a0fc48dc9769df35d682ece477246b2df2fc0d4 
>   src/sched/sched.cpp f1eeab6f12ee300d77013c6a4ba62ccd7fdb0d1d 
>   src/slave/cgroups_isolation_module.cpp 
> 14f549edaf1b37a6bca8f75309864333ae775e7c 
>   src/slave/lxc_isolation_module.cpp 30cff2a49339bb07030727d30352536a0a22d58c 
>   src/slave/process_based_isolation_module.cpp 
> 12a579cba56cd3dac384bc7919b0d5537b0e429d 
>   src/slave/reaper.hpp b9aa62daa42bdaa736ade43884982529ba3d4bb1 
>   src/slave/reaper.cpp c0ee4b4c07fd792bcb39455b666808b712eb32c2 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp d4721c3eb51db87278d05f6fbe2eadb8a3a9b4dd 
>   src/slave/solaris_project_isolation_module.cpp 
> f3b6a68926af34c46873d8de1c9858480f42ef98 
>   src/tests/cgroups_tests.cpp b219906374764e91f1a5268469ae92dd0fe08e53 
>   src/tests/master_tests.cpp 948ab5dff34eeba1f3ce593a864ddf282c8b19ed 
>   src/tests/process_spawn.cpp 04e836f8eed7312dbee27e20399e7d0e59df0bc2 
>   src/tests/reaper_tests.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/tests/script.cpp ebd2ab52e4de2dac744712b5adb1107a33ed29df 
>   src/tests/utils.hpp be457117515ee727af101370b26bf9188afb8f45 
>   third_party/libprocess/Makefile.am dad1b65c3fdb7dbdad4e7c3d9c241cc4e89c3325 
>   third_party/libprocess/include/stout/proc.hpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8570/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vinod Kone
> 
>

Reply via email to