> On March 7, 2013, 8:17 a.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> > src/slave/process_based_isolation_module.cpp, lines 331-332
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/9795/diff/1/?file=267811#file267811line331>
> >
> >     s/descendant/child/ and s/ancestor/parent/?

Went with parent and descendant.


> On March 7, 2013, 8:17 a.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> > src/slave/process_based_isolation_module.cpp, line 344
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/9795/diff/1/?file=267811#file267811line344>
> >
> >     If we ever start to integrate some of the monitoring into the webui it 
> > would be swell to be able to play with it on our laptops. For that, I 
> > suggest some os::shell calls here. See src/scripts/killtree.sh for 
> > inspiration (I could even imagine a minor refactor of killtree.sh so you 
> > can easily just print all pids in the tree without actually killing them, 
> > i.e., by sending them a CONT signal or 0).

Agreed, I'm planning on implementing an OSX proc interface. Maybe that 
interface shells out as you said, but I was planning on doing it 
programmatically.


> On March 7, 2013, 8:17 a.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> > src/slave/process_based_isolation_module.cpp, line 307
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/9795/diff/1/?file=267811#file267811line307>
> >
> >     Adding on to a comment in another review, this would then be 
> > 'proc::status(info->pid)' which sounds good to me and a /proc/[pid]/status 
> > actually exists and is just the prettyfied version of /proc/[pid]/status.

Done in the earlier review. I find it easier to linearly progress through the 
reviews, so adding comments like this in the right review helps me a lot!


- Ben


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9795/#review17522
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 7, 2013, 3:18 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/9795/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 7, 2013, 3:18 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See subject.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug MESOS-370.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-370
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/process_based_isolation_module.cpp 
> ff98d105af675dfc66070feaa43b42c1aa438fd8 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9795/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check and added tests in a subsequent review
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ben Mahler
> 
>

Reply via email to