-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10142/#review19274
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!



src/slave/slave.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/10142/#comment39921>

    Point out that this implies the framework is shutting down everywhere.



src/slave/slave.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/10142/#comment39919>

    Log the fact of whether we could remove it from the queued tasks for the 
executor.
    
    If we can't then the WARNING should be logged as before.



src/slave/slave.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/10142/#comment39920>

    WARNING?



src/slave/slave.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/10142/#comment39922>

    s/This/TERMINATED/
    
    s/double// and "runs the executor driver in a child process"



src/slave/slave.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/10142/#comment39923>

    Ditto



src/slave/slave.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/10142/#comment39925>

    Comment as to how this state is possible.



src/slave/slave.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/10142/#comment39926>

    Add an explicit case for TERMINATED that falls through to default.



src/slave/slave.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/10142/#comment39927>

    Can you remove this for me?
    
    Ditto for _unwatch :)



src/slave/slave.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/10142/#comment39928>

    This needs to check discarded if we remove the CHECK.



src/slave/slave.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/10142/#comment39931>

    model this after the switch style in json.hpp



src/slave/slave.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/10142/#comment39930>

    kill breaks in these



src/slave/slave.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/10142/#comment39929>

    either default or this, but not both



src/slave/slave.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/10142/#comment39932>

    ditto


- Ben Mahler


On April 15, 2013, 11:54 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10142/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 15, 2013, 11:54 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This is based off https://reviews.apache.org/r/10112.
> 
> Also fixed TODOs and other misc stuff from the above review.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/isolator.hpp d702041784f5db159efd7da4d916405e86d99741 
>   src/slave/slave.hpp 2529bf500a3265b10ad4cddde10c2d62a6cdb4a0 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp 325231458a6883019436e7cc5a37f85f0f5735fa 
>   src/slave/status_update_manager.hpp 
> e6ca40c5c05c0952cf76fb1db7eff2e4270c0d24 
>   src/slave/status_update_manager.cpp 
> 044d245f370ef23ddc67fadbf7f8fe9d75dd662a 
>   src/tests/isolator.hpp f885ccb44e809383e658f45d9a03eda174cf2d72 
>   src/tests/slave_recovery_tests.cpp d0ff9b73e06e89a5409f038be2766333e0a0689e 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10142/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vinod Kone
> 
>

Reply via email to