> On June 3, 2013, 11:35 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote: > > What was the motivation for this? This seems to allow multiple terminal > > updates, which seems conflicting, no? > > Vinod Kone wrote: > We had to do this because some frameworks use terminal updates to do task > reconciliation. Added a TODO to disallow it once we have all the required > pieces in place (e.g., registrar).
Ah, I see! - Ben ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11549/#review21368 ----------------------------------------------------------- On June 4, 2013, 1:02 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/11549/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated June 4, 2013, 1:02 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos and Benjamin Hindman. > > > Description > ------- > > See summary. > > > This addresses bug MESOS-482. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-482 > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/slave/status_update_manager.hpp > 795e74c2b88a071eb7ba720118e06077b6e41238 > src/slave/status_update_manager.cpp > 9e9e4e2a47a609d65ed69a57de595852144a86c8 > src/tests/status_update_manager_tests.cpp > 61ccfcc8165337d02af5641884beee45a2aaa065 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11549/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > GLOG_v=1 ./bin/mesos-tests.sh --gtest_filter="*TerminateEmptyStream*" > --verbose --gtest_repeat=1000 --gtest_break_on_failure > > > Thanks, > > Vinod Kone > >
