> On June 7, 2013, 5:22 a.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> > Really really really nice work Vinod. This is super clean and IMHO easy to 
> > reason about. Nice to have some clean semantics re: task lifecycle.

thanks! someone nudged me this way :)


> On June 7, 2013, 5:22 a.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> > src/slave/slave.hpp, line 339
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/11694/diff/1/?file=301598#file301598line339>
> >
> >     Food for thought: s/removeTask/completeTask/

done


> On June 7, 2013, 5:22 a.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> > src/slave/slave.hpp, line 345
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/11694/diff/1/?file=301598#file301598line345>
> >
> >     Ha, BenM and I had a conversation today about the use of the word 
> > 'pending' in Hadoop (i.e., does pendingMaps/Reduces() mean maps/reduces 
> > that we still need to launch or maps/reduces that have been launched but 
> > haven't completed yet?). I think that the same thing applies here. Maybe 
> > s/pendingTasks/unfinishedTasks/ or better incompleteTasks (since the ring 
> > buffer is "completedTasks")? IMHO it's easier to interpret 
> > 'incompleteTasks' as implying _both_ tasks that are queued (what some might 
> > consider "pending") and those that are already launched.

went with incompleteTasks.


- Vinod


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11694/#review21559
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 6, 2013, 8:39 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/11694/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 6, 2013, 8:39 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/slave.hpp 26dc96e5f2fdc0711fc49a9ea80b7f037bf93c29 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp 8ce1646f2f804bc8dc20506d11078191f0274654 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11694/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vinod Kone
> 
>

Reply via email to