On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 01:11:52PM -0500, Eleanor Saitta wrote:
On 2014.12.11 12.53, David R. Andersen wrote:
Its my feeling that it would be inappropriate for the dealership to
be able to turn to a third party and say "here's an undeniable
transcript of Dave's negotiation with us," and I suspect the
dealership would feel the same way. Deniability to third parties
is important in at least some negotiations.
What you're talking about here is appropriately served by
confidentiality and has always been served by such. It does not require
inventing implausible new invariants.
I don't believe an undeniable transcript can generally be confidential.
There will always be a copy laying around somewhere that can be
leaked, voluntarily or otherwise. Further, even the threat of leak will
change the dynamic of some negotiations.
--
int x=90560580,y=32678;main(){putchar(x);x>>=y&7;y>>=3;return y?main():0;}
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
_______________________________________________
Messaging mailing list
Messaging@moderncrypto.org
https://moderncrypto.org/mailman/listinfo/messaging
