> Your understanding is incorrect. Tor is *very* general purpose... > I mean... come on, it transports any stream. What is specific about that? From user perspective yes, I completely agree, but I was talking about implementation: cells format, commands, etc. Ronion has less commands in its spec and separates itself from some higher level features allowing more flexibility there.
> Your are proposing that Tor Project do what exactly? Rewrite Tor to use a > library > that performs onion routing? I like this idea but it's not going to happen > any time soon. At the moment I'm not proposing anything, I'm just evaluating whether it would be possible. > Although, I would think that there better be a compelling reason > to use a hella slow link layer for a mix network... where a noise based link > layer that is actually fast and efficient would do. Not really sure what do you mean here. Sincerely, Nazar Mokrynskyi github.com/nazar-pc _______________________________________________ Messaging mailing list Messaging@moderncrypto.org https://moderncrypto.org/mailman/listinfo/messaging
