german news article about panoramix and autocrypt/nextleap http://fm4.orf.at/stories/2877814/
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 04:10:25PM +0000, dawuud wrote: > > > I wonder, in general can we have nice things? Can we finally have a > > cryptographic messaging system that protects against intersection > > attacks? To that end I've been putting together a reading list so that > > If my understanding is correct, the answer is No. No we cannot prevent > longterm intersection attacks by using decoy traffic in the > katzenpost/loopix system because users will go offline and come back > online later which changes the anonymity set size and thus leaks > information to a global network observer. > > I suspect that there are mixnet use cases which are not vulnerable or > less vulnerable to this... such that user or application behavior does not > form a "session" where users send multiple messages over long periods which > can be linked by a passive observer. > _______________________________________________ > Messaging mailing list > Messaging@moderncrypto.org > https://moderncrypto.org/mailman/listinfo/messaging
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Messaging mailing list Messaging@moderncrypto.org https://moderncrypto.org/mailman/listinfo/messaging
