On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:15 AM, Luo Zhenhua-B19537 <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Otavio and all, > > The FSL Yocto layers reorg proposal is attached, can you please take a look? > Any comment and suggestion is welcome and appreciated. >
1) Don't cross post to internal and external mailing lists. 2) I still don't really see the point in renaming from meta-fsl-ppc -> meta-fsl-qoriq as well as meta-fsl-arm to meta-fsl-imx. But, I wonder what others think about this. It seems like unneeded changes that will just cause confusion. Why not just put vybird in meta-fsl-arm? 3) I think we should delay the creation of some of these layers until we really have packages that are duplicated between two layers (e.g. meta-layerscape can wait until we have a recipe that is needed for both ARM and PPC and is not upstream in another layer) 4) I think we need some more info about the "unifed" layer. I don't think it needs to exist yet, but maybe others would like to see it. Personally, I think it can be created automatically much like poky is now. -M _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
