On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:16 AM, Luo Zhenhua-B19537 <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello all, > > Thanks a lot for the comments. > > I did some update according to the feedback and removed some bits of internal > activity. Please review and comment.
>From the update, I think it is much more inline with I believe it'd be the best way of doing it. Personally I found two things which could be further discussed: * meta-fsl-layerscale: As Vybrid it could have the BSP part inside meta-fsl-arm and meta-fsl-ppc; I think the not BSP parts could go to meta-fsl-networking or similar and keep the BSP part unified. This would make easier for users and also make it easier for vendors to make customized BSPs using this as a common base. * meta-freescale-sdk: It is not clear from the description what it would have inside. If it are going to have poky and all other layers the name is misleading. freescale-sdk or freescale-yocto-sdk would be better. Could you clarify it? Regards, -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: [email protected] http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
