On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Eric Bénard <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Otavio, > > Le Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:56:01 -0300, > Otavio Salvador <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:48 PM, John Weber <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Are we completely gutting the old u-boot for wandboard dual? This patch >> > doesn't pertain to mainline but it does still work for the FSL u-boot. >> >> I'd prefer to remove old and unused code. Except if you have a reason >> to keep it? >> >> Both Dual and Solo variants are going to use U-Boot mainline and noone >> will use this, except if explicitly set. So I think in the end it >> won't be used at all. Do you see a reason to keep it? > > maybe because you are migrating several boards to a new bootloader which > is not even stable (u-boot 2013.04 is at rc2) and not present in the > official Freescale BSP ?
Wandboard support is not present in official BSP either; the U-Boot is being daily tested by Fabio and me so it had a good coverage. > Or maybe the policy has changed since last week and you consider > there is no risk to migrate to a -rc bootloader just before the > release ;-) The point is support. In case of maintain branch of kernel you won't be able to open SR issues about this kernel while U-Boot the support is already given by community. So the policy is to allow the change when we will have support; not the opposite. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: [email protected] http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
