Le Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:13:48 -0300, Otavio Salvador <[email protected]> a écrit : > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Eric Bénard <[email protected]> wrote: > > Le Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:48:31 -0300, > > Otavio Salvador <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> You are welcome to review the patches and test; I just cannot keep > >> holding patches for so long as it is a nightmare to manage a huge > >> queue of patches. Specially when they are tested and need more wider > >> test. > > > > less then 24 hours between sending the match on the ML and comitting > > them doesn't allow any serious testing by the ML readers. > > Agreed. It was indeed less than 24 hours. > > Next time I will give 48 hours for huge or complex patchsets; I just
48h is very short for people to test such big changes especially for those who have other occupations than meta-fsl-arm. Most versions of software in meta-fsl-* don't change very fast so allowing something like a week for peoples to test doesn't seems a big issue. > don't see a reason to wait 24 hours for trivial bug fixes however I > agree a U-Boot change needs more time and will follow this rule next > time. > because even a trivial bugfix can contain an error or someone else may have ideas for a better fix so review is important unless. And in the present case, you default many boards to a bootloader version which is not a stable one which IMHO is a not a good thing. Eric _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
