Le Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:20:25 -0300, Daiane Angolini <[email protected]> a écrit :
> On 08/28/2013 01:43 PM, Daiane Angolini wrote: > > I've been running some tests on master-next. > > > > I used the following commands. Do you know any other I could run? > > > > > > The past email, was for SOFT fp > > RESULTS: > > $ DISPLAY=:0 glxgears > > 108 frames in 5.0 seconds = 21.508 FPS > > > > $ DISPLAY=:0 es2gears_x11 > > 1494 frames in 5.0 seconds = 298.740 FPS > > > > $ DISPLAY=:0 glmark2-es2 > > glmark2 Score: 212 > > > > $ DISPLAY=:0 glmark2-es2 --fullscreen > > glmark2 Score: 229 > > The results for HARD fp: > > > $ DISPLAY=:0 glxgears > 107 frames in 5.0 seconds = 21.395 FPS > > $ DISPLAY=:0 es2gears_x11 > 1451 frames in 5.0 seconds = 290.200 FPS > > $ DISPLAY=:0 glmark2-es2 > glmark2 Score: 213 > > $ DISPLAY=:0 glmark2-es2 --fullscreen > glmark2 Score: 228 > so hardfp brings lower results than softfp ... interesting ;-) Eric _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
