On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:12 PM, xxiao8 <[email protected]> wrote: > I would have hoped Freescale stuck with 3.10.17 instead of 3.10.31 to make > 3.10.17 solid in the first place, unless 3.10.31 brought in something that > is a must-to-have I don't see the reason to make things unnecessarily > complicated. Customer can always patch to whatever 3.10.x when they want to > as those incremental patches are normally independent of Freescale's code > changes. Not to mention nowadays it's 3.10.53 now. > > Backport 3.10.31-beta to 3.10.17 and make this a gold release kernel is the > best option in my opinion. I again don't see the point to diverge at all.
Please, if you want your vote to be considered do it in the another thread and inform your full name (as your name is not in from). -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
