Just switched from digest mode to single email mode and waiting for
whoever does the next vote, then I will have the thread to vote on...
xxiao
On 08/20/2014 02:41 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:12 PM, xxiao8 <[email protected]> wrote:
I would have hoped Freescale stuck with 3.10.17 instead of 3.10.31 to make
3.10.17 solid in the first place, unless 3.10.31 brought in something that
is a must-to-have I don't see the reason to make things unnecessarily
complicated. Customer can always patch to whatever 3.10.x when they want to
as those incremental patches are normally independent of Freescale's code
changes. Not to mention nowadays it's 3.10.53 now.
Backport 3.10.31-beta to 3.10.17 and make this a gold release kernel is the
best option in my opinion. I again don't see the point to diverge at all.
Please, if you want your vote to be considered do it in the another
thread and inform your full name (as your name is not in from).
--
_______________________________________________
meta-freescale mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
