On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Daiane Angolini <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Otavio Salvador <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Lauren Post <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> 3.10.53 only exists in master branch now so to remove it means it will not >>> exist on any branch. >> >> It exists in Git so if someone ever wants or need it, can easily >> revert the patch and use. >> >>> In past we only removed kernel versions that exist in other branches. >> >> It was just by coincidence because of the release cadence matched the >> branching. >> >>> I believe it is best to leave 3.10.53 and remove in master branch after >>> fido branch is created. >> >> I see no reason to keep it around and untested from now on. Community >> resources for test are restrict so it will end untested plus the more >> people relying on 3.14 the better as it is closer to mainline. >> >> Someone one has any technical reason to keep it around? > > Is 3.14 beta or GA?
It is a GA release. > I think this is a good technical reason to keep 3.10.53 if this is the > only GA kernel available at time. 3.14.28-1.0.0 and 3.10.53 are both GA kernels. > Another important point is GPU compatibility. Is 3.14 GPU compatible > with 3.10.53 GPU? It is compatible, so people using 3.10.53 in -arm-extra does not need to panic :) -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
