Hi Otavio and Lauren,
On 04/06/2015 09:26 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Lauren Post <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> 3.10.53 only exists in master branch now so to remove it means it will not
>> exist on any branch.
>
> It exists in Git so if someone ever wants or need it, can easily
> revert the patch and use.
>
>> In past we only removed kernel versions that exist in other branches.
>
> It was just by coincidence because of the release cadence matched the
> branching.
>
>> I believe it is best to leave 3.10.53 and remove in master branch after fido
>> branch is created.
What's the plan for the default FSL kernel in fido?
If it's 3.14, then it seems unlikely that folks will be using 3.10.53.
>
> I see no reason to keep it around and untested from now on. Community
> resources for test are restrict so it will end untested plus the more
> people relying on 3.14 the better as it is closer to mainline.
>
Can you clarify what you mean by 'it'?
> Someone one has any technical reason to keep it around?
>
If you're referring to 3.10.53 recipe for Freescale kernel, the
tag/branch in git.freescale.com should be sufficient.
Looking at Otavio's patch set, it appears that the changes include
both kernel updates as well as some remaining packages (firmware-imx,
imx-test, and such) that are named to reflect the kernel version
numbering.
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/2015-April/013274.html
Having those old recipes around is probably more useful than the
kernel, since I don't think they're all backed by proper git
repositories.
How about just tagging/branching meta-fsl-* with a 3.10.53 name to
make it easy to grab the set from before the switch?
Regards,
Eric
--
_______________________________________________
meta-freescale mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
