On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Nikolay Dimitrov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Fabio, > > On 05/04/2015 03:41 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: >> >> Hi Nikolay, >> >> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +# FIXME: Workaround for building against linux-fslc >>> +RDEPENDS_${PN}_remove_imx6dl-riotboard = "gst-plugins-gl" >> >> >> This doesn't seem to scale very well as we would need to put every >> mx6q/dl board that uses linux-fslc in this list. >> >> Regards, >> >> Fabio Estevam > > > I completely understand and agree, but I don't feel qualified to force > all other mx6 maintainers to use the same approach. If others decide to > go this way, we can then use the "_remove" clause for all "mx6" SOCs, > and put appropriate comment in the file. But as of today, I don't see > such push.
gst-plugins-gl is included in the image by: https://github.com/Freescale/meta-fsl-demos/blob/master/recipes-fsl/packagegroups/packagegroup-fsl-gstreamer-full.bb#L21 right? So, remove opengl from your DISTRO_FEATURES and it should work. However, we have already this line: https://github.com/Freescale/meta-fsl-demos/blob/master/recipes-fsl/packagegroups/packagegroup-fsl-gstreamer-full.bb#L27 Which means mx6sl cannot handle gst-plugins-gl. Riot is not mx6sl, so maybe you have spoted another corner case. > > Considering the amount of discussion my patches provoke, I'm now more > inclined to propose micro-changes that are more obvious/easier to > approve and move forward. Please, keep the discussion up and running. Please, keep the questions and the patches, we really need more experienced board maintainers for the community boards. Daiane > > Kind regards, > Nikolay > > -- > _______________________________________________ > meta-freescale mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
