Hi Daiane,
On 05/04/2015 08:06 PM, Daiane Angolini wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Nikolay Dimitrov <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi Fabio,
On 05/04/2015 03:41 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Nikolay,
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov
<[email protected]> wrote:
+# FIXME: Workaround for building against linux-fslc
+RDEPENDS_${PN}_remove_imx6dl-riotboard = "gst-plugins-gl"
This doesn't seem to scale very well as we would need to put
every mx6q/dl board that uses linux-fslc in this list.
Regards,
Fabio Estevam
I completely understand and agree, but I don't feel qualified to
force all other mx6 maintainers to use the same approach. If others
decide to go this way, we can then use the "_remove" clause for all
"mx6" SOCs, and put appropriate comment in the file. But as of
today, I don't see such push.
gst-plugins-gl is included in the image by:
https://github.com/Freescale/meta-fsl-demos/blob/master/recipes-fsl/packagegroups/packagegroup-fsl-gstreamer-full.bb#L21
right?
So, remove opengl from your DISTRO_FEATURES and it should work.
However, we have already this line:
https://github.com/Freescale/meta-fsl-demos/blob/master/recipes-fsl/packagegroups/packagegroup-fsl-gstreamer-full.bb#L27
Which means mx6sl cannot handle gst-plugins-gl. Riot is not mx6sl,
so maybe you have spoted another corner case.
Thanks for your comments. I've already sent an email with same analysis
just before sending the patch, which uses the described above method.
Considering the amount of discussion my patches provoke, I'm now
more inclined to propose micro-changes that are more obvious/easier
to approve and move forward.
Please, keep the discussion up and running. Please, keep the
questions and the patches, we really need more experienced board
maintainers for the community boards.
Regards,
Nikolay
--
_______________________________________________
meta-freescale mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
