Hi Otavio,
On 06/17/2015 09:39 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov <[email protected]> wrote:
On 06/17/2015 09:30 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 06/17/2015 09:02 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
This recipe provides the FSL Community's i.MX6 Linux which is a Linux
kernel based on Freescale 3.14.28-1.0.0 GA release, used by FSL
Community BSP in order to provide support for i.MX6 based platforms.
The fork includes the official Linux kernel stable updates, backported
features and fixes coming from the vendors, kernel community or FSL
Community itself.
This version is based on 3.14.44 stable release and includes following
changes on top of both kernels:
9e71c2c ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: Enable kexec support
3b15ffa Revert "net: fec: fix the warning found by dma debug"
3183696 mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: Fixup runtime PM conditions during
->probe()
434d1b2 ARM: 8338/1: kexec: Relax SMP validation to improve DT
compatibility
33bb67d gpio: generic: clamp retured value to [0,1]
192f32d ARM: imx6sl: Disable imx6sl-specific code when imx6sl SOC
support
is disabled
Change-Id: I0d5b21a0381c64b323c73cded73a93a4f218f50d
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <[email protected]>
---
recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc-mx6/defconfig | 414
++++++++++++++++++++++
recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc-mx6_3.14-1.0.x.bb | 16 +
2 files changed, 430 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc-mx6/defconfig
create mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc-mx6_3.14-1.0.x.bb
I personally think that the naming of this kernel will cause confusion.
Any suggestion?
Anything that doesn't contain "fslc", like "linux-fsl", "linux-imx",
"linux-imx6" or similar.
What do you think?
I think it is important to provide the credit to fslc as this is not
an fsl initiative or a generic imx kernel.
I think the credit already goes everywhere - source code license,
author's rights in each file, etc. To be honest, I was thinking mostly
about functionality and not about credit.
So, in terms of functionality this kernel sits somewhere between
mainline and FSL releases, is that correct?
Regards,
Nikolay
--
_______________________________________________
meta-freescale mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
