On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Otavio Salvador <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 06/17/2015 09:39 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 06/17/2015 09:30 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 06/17/2015 09:02 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This recipe provides the FSL Community's i.MX6 Linux which is a Linux >>>>>>> kernel based on Freescale 3.14.28-1.0.0 GA release, used by FSL >>>>>>> Community BSP in order to provide support for i.MX6 based platforms. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The fork includes the official Linux kernel stable updates, backported >>>>>>> features and fixes coming from the vendors, kernel community or FSL >>>>>>> Community itself. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This version is based on 3.14.44 stable release and includes following >>>>>>> changes on top of both kernels: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 9e71c2c ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: Enable kexec support >>>>>>> 3b15ffa Revert "net: fec: fix the warning found by dma debug" >>>>>>> 3183696 mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: Fixup runtime PM conditions during >>>>>>> ->probe() >>>>>>> 434d1b2 ARM: 8338/1: kexec: Relax SMP validation to improve DT >>>>>>> compatibility >>>>>>> 33bb67d gpio: generic: clamp retured value to [0,1] >>>>>>> 192f32d ARM: imx6sl: Disable imx6sl-specific code when imx6sl SOC >>>>>>> support >>>>>>> is disabled >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Change-Id: I0d5b21a0381c64b323c73cded73a93a4f218f50d >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <[email protected]> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc-mx6/defconfig | 414 >>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>>> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc-mx6_3.14-1.0.x.bb | 16 + >>>>>>> 2 files changed, 430 insertions(+) >>>>>>> create mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc-mx6/defconfig >>>>>>> create mode 100644 >>>>>>> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc-mx6_3.14-1.0.x.bb >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I personally think that the naming of this kernel will cause confusion. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Any suggestion? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Anything that doesn't contain "fslc", like "linux-fsl", "linux-imx", >>>> "linux-imx6" or similar. >>>> >>>> What do you think? >>> >>> >>> I think it is important to provide the credit to fslc as this is not >>> an fsl initiative or a generic imx kernel. >> >> >> I think the credit already goes everywhere - source code license, >> author's rights in each file, etc. To be honest, I was thinking mostly >> about functionality and not about credit. >> >> So, in terms of functionality this kernel sits somewhere between >> mainline and FSL releases, is that correct? > > Yes; it is FSL release + stable releases + vendor/community fixes
I've been thinking about this issue. And this provider (for imx6 only) may make sense to have "fslc" sufix, exactly because it has freescale + community patches However, the other (currently linux-fslc) does not make sense. Maybe linux-cmt makes more sense today. I remember one of the arguments to not use only "linux" and use a prefix was that it's not a pure mainline provider (it clones from github) and because it leave the "linux" only for internal kernels Any other suggestion? Daiane > > -- > Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems > http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br > Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 > -- > _______________________________________________ > meta-freescale mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
