On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Nikolay Dimitrov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ann, > > On 07/11/2015 12:33 AM, Ann Thornton wrote: >> >> On 7/10/2015 2:21 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov wrote: >>> >>> Hi Ann, >>> >>> On 07/10/2015 09:32 PM, Ann Thornton wrote: >>>> >>>> The tools are grouped into core and extended with i.MX specific >>>> tools in a .bbappend file. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Ann Thornton <[email protected]> >>>> --- >>>> .../packagegroups/packagegroup-fsl-tools-core.bb | 39 >>>> +++++++++++++++++ >>>> .../packagegroup-fsl-tools-extended.bb | 45 >>>> ++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> .../packagegroup-fsl-tools-extended.bbappend | 13 ++++++ >>>> 3 files changed, 97 insertions(+) >>>> create mode 100644 >>>> recipes-fsl/packagegroups/packagegroup-fsl-tools-core.bb >>>> create mode 100644 >>>> recipes-fsl/packagegroups/packagegroup-fsl-tools-extended.bb >>>> create mode 100644 >>>> recipes-fsl/packagegroups/packagegroup-fsl-tools-extended.bbappend >>> >>> >>> Just curious regarding the naming of packagegroup-fsl-tools-core: what >>> makes it FSL-specific? >> >> >> Nothing, really. Except that this is fsl-demos. Should it be named >> without the fsl? > > > I think it would be better this way. I also looked at the extended > packagegroup, and it can also go without the fsl. > > I'm leaving the final choice to your discretion.
More than that, is this a good name? tools ... tools for what? profiling? debugging? installation? for what? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
