On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 5:28 AM, Otavio Salvador <[email protected]> wrote: >> 1) Does this from ~20 months ago still hold true that meta-fsl-arm kernels >> cannot be >> configured via fragments? >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/2014-February/007037.html > > Yes, it does.
Is it in how the kernel recipes are written that fragments aren't supported? Or does it go deeper than that? > 4.x works on Wandboard however it won't offer support for some parts > of the SoC, at this moment (GPU acceleration, some degree of IPU and > VPU, ...). So if I understand kernel development correctly, the extra Wandboard support is due to contributions to linux-wandboard kernel that didn't get upstreamed? Is there a way to find these contributions besides reading commit logs/doing diffs? Thanks for the clarifications. I've been using Yocto for almost a year now, but it's such a beast, I probably only really understand <1% of it. The rest I just say a prayer that nothing goes wrong before each build. =) -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
