On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Edward Wingate <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 5:28 AM, Otavio Salvador > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> 1) Does this from ~20 months ago still hold true that meta-fsl-arm kernels >>> cannot be >>> configured via fragments? >>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/2014-February/007037.html >> >> Yes, it does. > > Is it in how the kernel recipes are written that fragments aren't > supported? Or does it go deeper than that?
For it to be properly supported we ought to use the Linux Yocto framework and we do not use it. >> 4.x works on Wandboard however it won't offer support for some parts >> of the SoC, at this moment (GPU acceleration, some degree of IPU and >> VPU, ...). > > So if I understand kernel development correctly, the extra Wandboard > support is due to contributions to linux-wandboard kernel that didn't > get upstreamed? Is there a way to find these contributions besides > reading commit logs/doing diffs? Well, more than that. The missing features is because Freescale did not upstream yet all the features for the mainline kernel. > Thanks for the clarifications. I've been using Yocto for almost a > year now, but it's such a beast, I probably only really understand <1% > of it. The rest I just say a prayer that nothing goes wrong before > each build. =) =) I wish you good luck! -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
