On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Stefan Agner <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2015-12-03 10:17, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> I prefer SoC family as it makes easier for end customers to customized >> it without need to override the compatibility set in a bbappend. As >> this provides a SoM it is common it ends being used in a custom >> carrier board and eventually a new machine file in a customer layer >> can reuse the recipe. > > This is a good point, so e.g. if somebody would need to alter the > machine and would create a machine like apalis-imx6-mycarrier. We > actually would need another inheritance like SoC, for boards/carrier > boards...
Yes but this can be add on the machine itself. The compatibile would demand a bbappend usually. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
