Hello Otavio, Before meta-fsl-arm and meta-fsl-ppc are formally replaced by meta-freescale in yoctoproject.org, we should ensure the QorIQ bits are available in meta-fsl-arm and meta-fsl-ppc.
The duplicated effort is done for both i.MX and QorIQ products currently, to avoid such duplicated effort, we'd better make meta-freescale replace fsl-arm and fsl-ppc ASAP. What's your thought? Best Regards, Zhenhua > -----Original Message----- > From: Otavio Salvador [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 2:33 AM > To: Ting Liu <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; Zhenhua Luo <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] Updates to meta-fsl-arm (master) in 2016-01-11 > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Ting Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > > I sent some patches to meta-fsl-arm on 2015-12-15 and noticed that they are > marked as 'rejected' just now. > > No comment for 'rejected'? > > I noticed they were the same sent for meta-freescale and as meta-fsl-arm is > not being use for QorIQ releases do you think it is worth keeping it receiving > changes? > > If it is really desired I can go over them but as meta-freescale is in use > for QorIQ > it seems like pushing them there makes more sense and avoid duplication. > > I didn't yet did a major review of them, as I am on holidays, but will do as > time > permits. > > -- > Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems > http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br > Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
