On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:36 AM, Zhenhua Luo <[email protected]> wrote: > Before meta-fsl-arm and meta-fsl-ppc are formally replaced by meta-freescale > in yoctoproject.org, we should ensure the QorIQ bits are available in > meta-fsl-arm and meta-fsl-ppc. > > The duplicated effort is done for both i.MX and QorIQ products currently, to > avoid such duplicated effort, we'd better make meta-freescale replace fsl-arm > and fsl-ppc ASAP. What's your thought?
Our goal should be to replace both meta-fsl-arm and meta-fsl-ppc with meta-freescale, sure. However there are some subtle but important differences between both. Patches from meta-fsl-ppc does not apply directly into meta-freescale due the reorganization and deduplication of QorIQ ARM and QorIQ recipes and, for me, the most important aspect is that QorIQ is using meta-freescale for the release. My goal is to try to get meta-freescale used for i.MX and QorIQ for April release; I intend to start more actively test this as soon as we merge current GA patches from i.MX. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
