Hello, On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:24 PM, Fabio Estevam <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Bas Mevissen <[email protected]> wrote: >> I tried linux-fslc@c4404197b0b22f479d9548e81a8a4ed639d4dd7c with commit >> 3e9b36edc01ec3b896bf212a2a7cccc32ed3f047 reverted and that works fine. > > I don't think that 3e9b36edc01ec3b896bf212a2a7cccc32ed3f047 should > have been applied to linux-fslc to start with. > > This commit is in linux-next currently and it will be part of the > upcoming 4.15-rc1. > > IMHO linux-fslc should only contain the patches from linux-stable tree > with a few exceptions like: new dts files, for example. > >> What's the best thing to do now? Revert 3e9b36e for now and push that to >> linux-fslc? > > I think we can do two things: > > - Revert 3e9b36e from linux-fslc
I did revert the it and pushed to linux-fslc. Please confirm it works. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
