On 21/11/2017 17:05, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:24 PM, Fabio Estevam <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Bas Mevissen <[email protected]> wrote:
I tried linux-fslc@c4404197b0b22f479d9548e81a8a4ed639d4dd7c with commit
3e9b36edc01ec3b896bf212a2a7cccc32ed3f047 reverted and that works fine.
I don't think that 3e9b36edc01ec3b896bf212a2a7cccc32ed3f047 should
have been applied to linux-fslc to start with.
This commit is in linux-next currently and it will be part of the
upcoming 4.15-rc1.
IMHO linux-fslc should only contain the patches from linux-stable tree
with a few exceptions like: new dts files, for example.
What's the best thing to do now? Revert 3e9b36e for now and push that to
linux-fslc?
I think we can do two things:
- Revert 3e9b36e from linux-fslc
I did revert the it and pushed to linux-fslc.
Please confirm it works.
Thanks a lot! I can confirm it works like a charm.
Cheers,
Bas.
--
_______________________________________________
meta-freescale mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
