Hi Arthur, On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 18:41 -0700, Arthur She wrote: > Hi Anuj, > Thanks for your reply. > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 10:55 PM Mittal, Anuj <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 22:24 -0700, Arthur She wrote: > > > Hi, > > > We run igt-gpu-tools with Chamelium for the graphic/DRM test in > > > Linaro. > > > Something like this. > > > The recipe we used is basically copied from meta-intel and did > > some > > > modifications > > > 1. Compile for ARM architecture > > > 2. Build git HEAD code instead of a specific version > > > 3. Migrate to Meson build system > > > 4. Enable Chamelium > > > > > > We're thinking about upstream the recipe to meta-oe, however, > > there > > > might be a duplicate recipe problem. > > > > > > > I wonder if this recipe can be in oe-core since it's needed by all > > and > > helps people validate core functionality and all recipes in > > DEPENDS/RDEPENDS are also in core? Would you minding sending it > > there > > and seek opinion? I will remove it from meta-intel in that case. > > I've sent it for review and gain some feedback. One of the problems > they concerned about is the duplicate recipe. > I will base on igt-gpu-tools_1.25.bb to revise the patch and send it > to oe-devel and meta-intel for review. > Does it work for you?
I just looked through the list archive and noticed that you had sent it to oe-devel/meta-oe. I was wondering if it should be sent specifically for inclusion in oe-core? The original email sent to oe-core list had [meta-oe] tag so I assume that was one of the reasons you were requested to send it to oe-devel list ... > > > But your version of the recipe in my opinion needs some > > modifications > > before it can be accepted there: > > > > 1, it should be pointing to the release tarball. > > The core maintainer also mentioned about it. I will use a specific > SHA instead of autorev. > > > 2, the LICENSE field is wrong. The recipe in meta-intel requires > > the > > xorg-app-common.inc file which sets the LICENSE field. Hence the & > > ISC. > > But in this version, that information is lost. > > They also pointed it out. > Should it be LICENSE = "MIT"? I think so. > > > 3, You might have to set SECURITY_LDFLAGS for it to work with > > default > > poky configuration. > > Is it particularly used for xorg? > We build it with our Weston image and it worked without any problem. > I am not sure if we specifically need to set those when using xorg. I never tried Weston. Fedora also does it: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/igt-gpu-tools/blob/master/f/igt-gpu-tools.spec#_95 Do you use meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc that sets SECURITY_LDFLAGS and includes them in TARGET_LDFLAGS? Thanks, Anuj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#6598): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-intel/message/6598 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/74790915/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-intel/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
