Hi Anuj, On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 8:03 PM Mittal, Anuj <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Arthur, > > On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 18:41 -0700, Arthur She wrote: > > Hi Anuj, > > Thanks for your reply. > > > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 10:55 PM Mittal, Anuj <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 22:24 -0700, Arthur She wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > We run igt-gpu-tools with Chamelium for the graphic/DRM test in > > > > Linaro. > > > > Something like this. > > > > The recipe we used is basically copied from meta-intel and did > > > some > > > > modifications > > > > 1. Compile for ARM architecture > > > > 2. Build git HEAD code instead of a specific version > > > > 3. Migrate to Meson build system > > > > 4. Enable Chamelium > > > > > > > > We're thinking about upstream the recipe to meta-oe, however, > > > there > > > > might be a duplicate recipe problem. > > > > > > > > > > I wonder if this recipe can be in oe-core since it's needed by all > > > and > > > helps people validate core functionality and all recipes in > > > DEPENDS/RDEPENDS are also in core? Would you minding sending it > > > there > > > and seek opinion? I will remove it from meta-intel in that case. > > > > I've sent it for review and gain some feedback. One of the problems > > they concerned about is the duplicate recipe. > > I will base on igt-gpu-tools_1.25.bb to revise the patch and send it > > to oe-devel and meta-intel for review. > > Does it work for you? > > I just looked through the list archive and noticed that you had sent it > to oe-devel/meta-oe. I was wondering if it should be sent specifically > for inclusion in oe-core? The original email sent to oe-core list had > [meta-oe] tag so I assume that was one of the reasons you were > requested to send it to oe-devel list ... > I submitted the patch to meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-graphics/. >From the mailing list <https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Mailing_lists>, I think it makes sense to send it to oe-devel list. > > > > > But your version of the recipe in my opinion needs some > > > modifications > > > before it can be accepted there: > > > > > > 1, it should be pointing to the release tarball. > > > > The core maintainer also mentioned about it. I will use a specific > > SHA instead of autorev. > > > > > 2, the LICENSE field is wrong. The recipe in meta-intel requires > > > the > > > xorg-app-common.inc file which sets the LICENSE field. Hence the & > > > ISC. > > > But in this version, that information is lost. > > > > They also pointed it out. > > Should it be LICENSE = "MIT"? > > I think so. > > > > > > 3, You might have to set SECURITY_LDFLAGS for it to work with > > > default > > > poky configuration. > > > > Is it particularly used for xorg? > > We build it with our Weston image and it worked without any problem. > > > > I am not sure if we specifically need to set those when using xorg. I > never tried Weston. Fedora also does it: > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/igt-gpu-tools/blob/master/f/igt-gpu-tools.spec#_95 > > Do you use meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc that sets > SECURITY_LDFLAGS and includes them in TARGET_LDFLAGS? > > I just checked our recipes, it seems we don't use security_flags.inc. I rebuilt igt-gpu-tools with SECURITY_LDFLAGS and it still worked with our image. I will keep it in the patch. Thanks, Arthur > Thanks, > > Anuj >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#6613): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-intel/message/6613 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/74790915/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-intel/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
