On 3/15/15, 8:04 AM, "Ong, Boon Leong" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>Also, is there an effort underway to fix the QAT sources? All of this >>looks very >>fragile and I'm concerned about it's maintainability over time. >> >QAT technology is under-going refactoring whereby kernel driver going >into Linux mainline. >and user-space into 01.org. There is good traction happening there. > >As for now, all we have now is QAT source package that is using >traditional tarball release with >mux layer to switch between coleto-creek and cave-creek chipset variant. >The recipe >is not applicable to romley or mohonpeak platform. That is why we are >targeting just >meta-crystalforest layer which supports both variants. > >Ya, the recipe is long because this single tarball QAT Mux contains two >tarballs for the >above variants. That is why we split into software packages according to >platforms. > >It seems to me that maybe the recipe can be restructure into a single inc >file and two bb files\ >for each of above variants? > >Is that reasonable ? I think that would be a significant improvement. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center -- _______________________________________________ meta-intel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
