Hi All Since I am moving out from the Yocto project (KTBR Team ) . New person Suresh ([email protected]) will take care of that QAT-core recipe implementation in future and submit again.
Thanks & Regards Sundar -----Original Message----- From: Darren Hart [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 3:42 AM To: Ong, Boon Leong; Manoharan, Sundara RajaX P; Saul Wold; '[email protected]' Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH 1/1 daisy/dizzy] meta-crystalforest: Initial Intel QAT recipe On 3/15/15, 8:04 AM, "Ong, Boon Leong" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>Also, is there an effort underway to fix the QAT sources? All of this >>looks very fragile and I'm concerned about it's maintainability over >>time. >> >QAT technology is under-going refactoring whereby kernel driver going >into Linux mainline. >and user-space into 01.org. There is good traction happening there. > >As for now, all we have now is QAT source package that is using >traditional tarball release with mux layer to switch between >coleto-creek and cave-creek chipset variant. >The recipe >is not applicable to romley or mohonpeak platform. That is why we are >targeting just meta-crystalforest layer which supports both variants. > >Ya, the recipe is long because this single tarball QAT Mux contains >two tarballs for the above variants. That is why we split into software >packages according to platforms. > >It seems to me that maybe the recipe can be restructure into a single >inc file and two bb files\ for each of above variants? > >Is that reasonable ? I think that would be a significant improvement. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center -- _______________________________________________ meta-intel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
