>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] [mailto:meta-intel-
>[email protected]] On Behalf Of Saul Wold
>Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2015 4:53 AM
>To: Mittal, AnujX; [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [meta-intel] [fido][PATCH v2 2/2] meta-crystalforest: qat makefile
>patches
>
>
>These patches should be part of the actual recipe patch since they are 
>referenced
>in that recipe.
>
>Think one logical unit, such that if we tried to bisect we would not get 
>failures,
>with 2 patches, this will cause a failure between the 2 patches if bisect lands
>there.
>
Saul,

Speaking of this matter,
I have seen maintainer from other community prefer smaller commits than one 
single logical unit. 
So, I asked Anuj & others here to make it smaller so that it is easier to keep 
track of the changes instead
one single large commit. 

It seems that you put more emphasis on single unit commit that helps in term of 
git bisect. 
Is that your preference? 

I do think that 2/2 --> 1/2 and 1/2 -> 2/2 in this patch-series to avoid 
partially update the patchseries 
and have build issue.

I would like to hear your commend here so that I don't get "dinged' by you in 
future ... =-)  
 
-- 
_______________________________________________
meta-intel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel

Reply via email to