On 07/08/2015 03:35 PM, Ong, Boon Leong wrote:
I do think that 2/2 --> 1/2 and 1/2 -> 2/2 in this patch-series to
avoid partially update the patchseries and have build issue.
That would have been one option, but since this was a new recipe and the patches
are required to start with I would prefer to see them as one patch, future
changes
could such as improving or modifying a given patch or part of the recipe should
be
individual patches as they they are incremental changes to a given patch.
Got it. If you find issue in the DPDK series, I will re-format the patch-series
to follow
the above principles for the first time submission of new recipe. Thanks for
guidance
above.
I think I understand what you are trying to do with the dpdk series, I
started looking at it today and began wondering if it would not have
been easier to have them collapsed, but I understand that you
cherry-picked and then updated, and introduced the patches before the
final recipes.
So, when I saw and understood your intent there, having multiple smaller
ones is OK. I honestly reviewed the finished product since that was
easier than trying to decipher the individual patches though!
Sau!
I would like to hear your commend here so that I don't get "dinged' by
you in future ... =-)
I don't mean to be harsh, just trying to be consistent.
Nay, you are not harsh, honestly.
I should have use 'advised' instead of 'dinged' ... =-)
Thanks again.
--
_______________________________________________
meta-intel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
