Hi Cal,

Thanks a lot for the reply.


>> If you (or any other users of meta-intel-dpdk on the list) could test using 
>> upstream libibverbs it would be much appreciated. I could then fix it >> to 
>> use upstream libibverbs or take a patch for it.


I'll have a look in near future hopefully.


Right now I am trying to send a patch to [email protected] using git 
send-email but it is failing with "550 5.7.1 Unable to relay", any pointers?


BR,
Awais
________________________________
From: Cal Sullivan <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2018 4:17 AM
To: Belal, Awais; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [meta-intel] outdated dpdk-dev-libibverbs

Hi Awais,

I don't know the history of why that version of libibverbs was used instead. 
Considering it no longer exists, I agree that it should be changed. 
Unfortunately I don't have any experience and likely lack the hardware for 
using dpdk, so I can only go as far as making sure it builds OK.

If you (or any other users of meta-intel-dpdk on the list) could test using 
upstream libibverbs it would be much appreciated. I could then fix it to use 
upstream libibverbs or take a patch for it.

Thanks,
Cal

On 03/09/2018 03:02 AM, Belal, Awais wrote:

Hi,


I was going through the meta-dpdk layer () and the actual dpdk package depends 
on dpdk-dev-libibverbs. Now, looking at the recipe for dpdk-dev-libibverbs it 
uses and outdated SRC_URI for fetching the sources (the actual tarball pointed 
to:  does not exist) and the yocto mirror is used to fetch the tarball instead. 
Are there any plans of fixing/updating this? Why isn't this using a generic 
libibverbs source?


BR,
Awais



-- 
_______________________________________________
meta-intel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel

Reply via email to