Hmm, I'm not sure. Are you subscribed to the list? IIRC I had to
manually approve your initial mail. Could be related.
Thanks,
Cal
On 03/14/2018 04:01 AM, Belal, Awais wrote:
Hi Cal,
Thanks a lot for the reply.
>> If you (or any other users of meta-intel-dpdk on the list) could
test using upstream libibverbs it would be much appreciated. I could
then fix it >> to use upstream libibverbs or take a patch for it.
I'll have a look in near future hopefully.
Right now I am trying to send a patch to [email protected]
using git send-email but it is failing with "550 5.7.1 Unable to
relay", any pointers?
BR,
/Awais/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Cal Sullivan <[email protected]>
*Sent:* Saturday, March 10, 2018 4:17 AM
*To:* Belal, Awais; [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [meta-intel] outdated dpdk-dev-libibverbs
Hi Awais,
I don't know the history of why that version of libibverbs was used
instead. Considering it no longer exists, I agree that it should be
changed. Unfortunately I don't have any experience and likely lack the
hardware for using dpdk, so I can only go as far as making sure it
builds OK.
If you (or any other users of meta-intel-dpdk on the list) could test
using upstream libibverbs it would be much appreciated. I could then
fix it to use upstream libibverbs or take a patch for it.
Thanks,
Cal
On 03/09/2018 03:02 AM, Belal, Awais wrote:
Hi,
I was going through the meta-dpdk layer () and the actual dpdk
package depends on dpdk-dev-libibverbs. Now, looking at the recipe
for dpdk-dev-libibverbs it uses and outdated SRC_URI for fetching the
sources (the actual tarball pointed to: does not exist) and the
yocto mirror is used to fetch the tarball instead. Are there any
plans of fixing/updating this? Why isn't this using a generic
libibverbs source?
BR,
/Awais/
--
_______________________________________________
meta-intel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
