On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 09:19:07AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > friend just got a beagleplay, asked me whether there was any > complication in building a simple core-image-minimal with yocto > project ... i did some quick research and, from what i read, it's as > simple as: > > 1) check out oe-core, meta-ti and meta-arm layers > 2) add all the relevant layers to bblayers.conf > 3) Set MACHINE = "beagleplay" > 4) "bitbake core-image-minimal" > > and one should get an appropriate wic image. > > one question -- are the "master" branches safe for all of the above, > or should one play it safe and check out "wrynose" for all of the > above? > > seems pretty straightforward. > > rday
Robert, You had already asked this back in January: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/topic/117104047 You can simply use genericarm64 w/o meta-ti layers, per Nishanth. My understanding is that genericarm64 uses pre-built FW binaries for low-level bootchain, such as SPL, ATF, OP-TEE, etc., while meta-ti builds those from sources. >From the kernel perspective, one uses vanilla upstream linux-yocto and the other uses patched TI kernel. From beagleplay perspective, the differences should be relatively minor. -- Denys
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#20024): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/message/20024 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/119756254/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
