On Thu, 11 Jun 2026, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 09:19:07AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > friend just got a beagleplay, asked me whether there was any > > complication in building a simple core-image-minimal with yocto > > project ... i did some quick research and, from what i read, it's as > > simple as: > > > > 1) check out oe-core, meta-ti and meta-arm layers > > 2) add all the relevant layers to bblayers.conf > > 3) Set MACHINE = "beagleplay" > > 4) "bitbake core-image-minimal" > > > > and one should get an appropriate wic image. > > > > one question -- are the "master" branches safe for all of the above, > > or should one play it safe and check out "wrynose" for all of the > > above? > > > > seems pretty straightforward. > > > > rday > > Robert, > > You had already asked this back in January: > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/topic/117104047 > > You can simply use genericarm64 w/o meta-ti layers, per Nishanth. > > My understanding is that genericarm64 uses pre-built FW binaries for > low-level bootchain, such as SPL, ATF, OP-TEE, etc., while meta-ti > builds those from sources. > > >From the kernel perspective, one uses vanilla upstream linux-yocto > and the other uses patched TI kernel. From beagleplay perspective, > the differences should be relatively minor.
you're right, i'd forgotten about that, my bad. rday
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#20025): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/message/20025 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/119756254/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
