On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 07:17:32PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 3 mei 2012, om 19:05 heeft Denys Dmytriyenko het volgende geschreven: > > > On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 07:05:13PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > >> > >> > >> Op 3 mei 2012 om 19:02 heeft Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]> het > >> volgende geschreven: > >> > >>> On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 09:26:51AM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Op 3 mei 2012, om 08:33 heeft Denys Dmytriyenko het volgende geschreven: > >>>> > >>>>> From: Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]> > >>>>> > >>>>> * Ported from Arago > >>>>> * Added version 4.06.00.01 of the Graphics SDK which supports Power > >>>>> Management > >>>>> features for the AM335x > >>>>> * Use a variable PLATFORM for the directory structure since newer SDKs > >>>>> use > >>>>> LinuxARMV7 and older SDKs use LinuxOMAP3 > >>>>> * Modifiy rc.pvr to check return of the insmod of pvrsrvkm. If this > >>>>> driver > >>>>> fails to load the devmem2 read access can put the system in a state > >>>>> where > >>>>> it will not come out of suspend. > >>>> > >>>> I keep bringing this up every few months: what's the plan to add the > >>>> necessary hooks to the kernel module to export the core revision in > >>>> sysfs > >>>> instead of using devmem2? The kernel module knows about the right memory > >>>> addressed and turns on the clocks it needs. And better: we can get rid > >>>> of > >>>> bogus ES revisions like 'ES8' since that's exactly the same core as > >>>> 'ES6' > >>>> from a userspace point of view. > >>> > >>> Thanks, I will forward your questions and suggestions to the Graphics > >>> team. > >>> Meanwhile, do you have any comments about the patch? > >> > >> X11 support needs to get redone completely for this one, dri and all :( > > > > I haven't looked at X11 support - what's wrong with it? > > You need to rebuild the omap3-sgx-modules with DRI support, install the > extra modules, etc. Then you need to install the xorg module and hope the > ABIs match, install a xorg.conf snippet, etc, etc. > > The best way forward is to have the gfx team rebuild the X stuff against the > X we have in OE, not the one IMGtec delivers.
That's a worthy goal, but may be difficult to achieve in a short time. You've been on the inside, you know all the limitations... What's the best alternative for now? -- Denys _______________________________________________ meta-ti mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
