On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 08:58:02PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 3 mei 2012, om 19:52 heeft Denys Dmytriyenko het volgende geschreven: > > > On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 07:17:32PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > >> > >> Op 3 mei 2012, om 19:05 heeft Denys Dmytriyenko het volgende geschreven: > >> > >>> On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 07:05:13PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Op 3 mei 2012 om 19:02 heeft Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]> het > >>>> volgende geschreven: > >>>> > >>>>> On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 09:26:51AM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Op 3 mei 2012, om 08:33 heeft Denys Dmytriyenko het volgende > >>>>>> geschreven: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> From: Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> * Ported from Arago > >>>>>>> * Added version 4.06.00.01 of the Graphics SDK which supports Power > >>>>>>> Management > >>>>>>> features for the AM335x > >>>>>>> * Use a variable PLATFORM for the directory structure since newer > >>>>>>> SDKs use > >>>>>>> LinuxARMV7 and older SDKs use LinuxOMAP3 > >>>>>>> * Modifiy rc.pvr to check return of the insmod of pvrsrvkm. If this > >>>>>>> driver > >>>>>>> fails to load the devmem2 read access can put the system in a state > >>>>>>> where > >>>>>>> it will not come out of suspend. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I keep bringing this up every few months: what's the plan to add the > >>>>>> necessary hooks to the kernel module to export the core revision in > >>>>>> sysfs > >>>>>> instead of using devmem2? The kernel module knows about the right > >>>>>> memory > >>>>>> addressed and turns on the clocks it needs. And better: we can get rid > >>>>>> of > >>>>>> bogus ES revisions like 'ES8' since that's exactly the same core as > >>>>>> 'ES6' > >>>>>> from a userspace point of view. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, I will forward your questions and suggestions to the Graphics > >>>>> team. > >>>>> Meanwhile, do you have any comments about the patch? > >>>> > >>>> X11 support needs to get redone completely for this one, dri and all :( > >>> > >>> I haven't looked at X11 support - what's wrong with it? > >> > >> You need to rebuild the omap3-sgx-modules with DRI support, install the > >> extra modules, etc. Then you need to install the xorg module and hope the > >> ABIs match, install a xorg.conf snippet, etc, etc. > >> > >> The best way forward is to have the gfx team rebuild the X stuff against > >> the > >> X we have in OE, not the one IMGtec delivers. > > > > That's a worthy goal, but may be difficult to achieve in a short time. > > You've > > been on the inside, you know all the limitations... > > > > What's the best alternative for now? > > Keep using 4.05, Roger and I have some sgx testing for 4.06 planned this > week. I really want to move to a 1.7 based system, 1.6 is just way too > buggy.
Ok, I can wait for you to test 4.06 out. Should I mask it with DP=-1 for now? -- Denys _______________________________________________ meta-ti mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
